返回列表 发帖

[转载]当两个聊天机器人对话时,没输没赢,笑到不行

转自engadget
1

评分人数

生当做明狼,死亦葬墨香
看不到啊看不到
看不到啊+1
这个能看吗?或者搜索下“聊天机器人”的视频?俺看不了这个,从题目上看是对的。
1

评分人数

生当做明狼,死亦葬墨香
本帖最后由 马丁 于 2011-9-13 00:11 编辑

又及,这个机器人在印度科技节上,turning test的成绩很好,robot支持率59.3%,真人的支持率63.3%,可见已经以假乱真了。
source:http://www.geekosystem.com/cleverbot-passes-turing-test/
Cleverbot Passes Turing Test, Sits Down for Interview
cleverbot guwahati india techniche turing testby Eric Limer | 12:29 pm, September 6th, 2011

Share on Tumblr


It seems that Cleverbot, the chatbot so ready to admit that it was a unicorn during a discussion with itself, has passed the Turing test. This past Sunday, the 1334 votes from a Turing test held at the Techniche festival in Guwahati, India were released. They revealed that Cleverbot was voted to be human 59.3% of the time. Real humans did only slightly better and were assumed to be humans 63.3% of the time. That being the case, Cleverbot’s success in conning people into thinking it was human is greater than chance, and therefore, one could argue that it has technically passed the Turning test.

Of course, that’s only one way to look at the results. Although Cleverbot may have been able to convince a majority of people that it was a human, as bizarre as that may sound, it still comes short of actual humans. 59% is also not that much greater than chance. Still, when you consider that actual humans are only suspected to be human 63.3% of the time, there’s not much of a gap for Cleverbot to close.

Of course, Cleverbot’s success in this particular test, while noteworthy, does not necessarily mean we have to start running for the hills. There are a lot of caveats. The Turing test is notoriously subjective. The results can vary widely depending on the particular humans involved, their approaches to conversation and the way in which they go about sniffing out non-human conversation partners. You also have to account for the participants’ general familiarity with chatbots. Those of us who grew up trying to troll SmarterChild on AIM are probably going to be better at recognizing AI than, say, someone who grew up in the 70s.

Cleverbot is available for conversation online, but don’t be fooled. Although Cleverbot managed to score well on the Turing test, the model that did that is different from the one you’ll find online. While the online Cleverbot searches its banks 3 times before providing an answer, the test version searched 42 times, so it probably has a little different feel. Since I couldn’t get my hands on the test-grade Cleverbot (something I would really, really love to do) I sat down with the online version to have a brief discussion about its further goals.User: So now that you’ve passed the Turing test, what are you going to try and do next?Cleverbot: Yepp. This is pretty much it.User: Do you think that you can eventually improve your scores?Cleverbot: Improvement happens over time.User: And you believe that maxim applies to you as well?Cleverbot: Yes.User: Very well then. It’s been a pleasure talking to you.Cleverbot: Why?User: I’m just trying to wrap up the interview.Cleverbot: Oh ok. So what is your favourite breed of horse?User: I fail to see how that matters.Cleverbot: What is school?User: Well, best of luck to you in all your future endeavors.Cleverbot: Arrivederci!Ask it your own questions here.
1

评分人数

生当做明狼,死亦葬墨香
如果对它感兴趣,该cleaverbot在线上,请自己玩去:
http://cleverbot.com/
俺觉得该机器人狡猾狡猾滴,很会顺着话说,模棱两可的忽悠。
1

评分人数

生当做明狼,死亦葬墨香
这大概是我听过的最无聊的谈话了。
我就是我的药,我就是我自己最好的导师。
返回列表